M
E
D
i
A
issue #3 / Fall-Winter 2007
eMAGAZiNE
 CRiTiCiSM  
Erin Suyehara
Belle Lettres >> 

           Moreover, Catherine’s developing predilection for finery seems to reverberate Villemert’s assertions “of the dress of women:” “It may be said, that the pleasure which holds the pre-eminence among women is that of shewing themselves, and being thought handsome. It is this which leads them from one circle to another” (66). Here, he underscores the affiliation between a woman’s pulchritude and her capacity to circulate in public. Similarly, after a propitious meeting with Miss Tilney, Catherine’s vexations, regarding her dress, perpetuate her urbane awareness of its magnitude: “[T]he evening of the following day was now the object of expectation, the future good. What gown and what head-dress she should wear on the occasion became her chief concern” (71 emphasis mine). She recognizes the frivolity of her concerns, “yet she lay awake…debating between her spotted and her tamboured muslin” (71). Catherine’s scrupulous desire to appeal to the Tilneys correlates with the aesthetic values, ascribed by the “Ladies Toilet,” which distinguishes the conception of fashion through the existence of a woman ameliorating her beauty: “Before the empire of Fashion was thoroughly established, and her subjects voluntarily paid to her the homage she receives at present, we find…that beauty resorted to every means to augment its splendour, and perpetuate its duration” (69). The message here personifies the nature of a woman’s attractiveness—her charms must evolve into greater beauty—a testament, corroborated by Villemert as well: “It is a stratagem of the sex to renew the same person, and reproduce it, with advantage, under various forms” (67). Catherine’s evolving penchant for fashion reveals the modish tastes and propensities of Austen’s era. With this accurate depiction of the fashionable world of the nineteenth-century, Austen emphasizes the significance of the debutante’s role as the epitome of elegance and decorum. Austen, like Villemert, alludes to the reciprocal association between these attributes and marriage—a relationship that will eventually afford Catherine a husband.

           As if attributing Villemert’s advice for young ladies in her novel, Austen’s portrayal of a young woman’s introduction into high fashion and courtship proliferates the genuine narratives of fashion magazines and conduct books. Northanger Abbey imparts an honest tale of the nineteenth-century hopeful bride, who subscribes to the laws of fashion as the personified existence of the haute couture. Catherine’s maturation thus embodies a refinement of style and culture—an evolving sense of grace that would disseminate and reinvent the charms of a real-life debutante.

           

 

Notes

1 This book, which was translated into English by Alexander Morrice, propagates the association between the culture of fashion and the social practices leading to marriage. Though Morrice’s treatise, as he names it, “is intended to raise the Female Sex to their entitled rank in Society,” his dedication to Caroline, the Princess of Wales, emphasizes the importance of such trends in British society.

 

2 According to Sitwell, little is known about Heideloff, a German, except that “he was one of a numerous family of painters…three generations of them,” who was raised to become an engraver and also supported himself by painting miniatures (2). His publication first appeared in May of 1794, and its only predecessor was a series of line-engravings drawn by Moreau le Jeune in the Monument de Costume, appearing in two sets in 1776 and 1783 (1). The illustrations, used by Heideloff’s contemporaries, were replaced, in his periodical, by hand-colored fashion plates (engravings), enhanced with gold and silver and uncharacteristic of other magazines during this time— Menuet de la Mariee (1786), La Promenade Publique (1792), and Promenade de la Galerie du Palais Royal (1797), for example (Sitwell 1, 3). Moreover, Aileen Ribeiro, another modern critic, in The Art of Dress: Fashion in England and France 1750 to 1820, substantiates that Heideloff’s publication was “the most famous of all English fashion magazines” (109). With the Gallery’s claims of being a record “‘of all the most fashionable and elegant Dresses in vogue’,” Ribeiro proposes that the magazine also “aimed to show the taste and restraint to be seen in English costume, rather than the wild exaggerations of French dress” (109).

 

 

Works Cited

Anonymous. “The Ladies’ Toilet: Fashions Represented in Engravings.” The Ladies’

Pocket Magazine 2 (1824-1840): 58, 61, 69. 7 October 2006. The  Gerritsen Collection: Women’s History Online, 1543-1945. <gerritsen.chadwyck.com>.

Austen, Jane. Northanger Abbey. 1818. New York: Penguin, 1995. 

Sitwell, Sacheverell. Gallery of Fashion 1790-1822 from Plates by Heideloff and

           Ackerman. London: B.T. Batsford LTD, 1949.

Ribeiro, Aileen. The Art of Dress: Fashion in England and France 1750 to 1820. New

           Haven:Yale UP, 1995.

Villemert, Bourdier de. The Friend of Women.London: Knight and Compton, 1802.

7 October 2006. The Gerritsen Collection: Women’s History Online, 1543-1945. <gerritsen.chadwyck.com>.

submit
contact
back
next
home
narrative and visual brain food